2012/11/8 Ben Wolfson <wolf...@gmail.com> > A message in early 2010 notes that there had been some discussion of > adding support for :>> to cond, but I suppose nothing came of > that---does anyone know why or if it's still something that might > happen?
Occasionally I had found found something like that useful, but more often than not you'd just get booleans when binding the result of a cond test (this is different to condp). Maybe the better answer would be something like cgrands flatter cond? http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2011/06/17/a-flatter-cond/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
