On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Herwig Hochleitner <hhochleit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Occasionally I had found found something like that useful, but more often > than not you'd just get booleans when binding the result of a cond test > (this is different to condp).
Is that true? I mean, lots of uses of condp I see have the p be =, and this came up for me precisely because I was using a map as the test in cond. In any case, when it *is* useful, it's pretty useful. > Maybe the better answer would be something like cgrands flatter cond? > http://clj-me.cgrand.net/2011/06/17/a-flatter-cond/ -- Ben Wolfson "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
