Guess we need a test for "seq'able" ;-) -FS.
On Nov 26, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Herwig Hochleitner <hhochleit...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/11/26 Philip Potter <philip.g.pot...@gmail.com> > > Since ISeq already is a seq and IPersistentCollection derives from Sequable, > > both will succeed in a seq call. > > A Seqable isn't necessarily a seq: > > Didn't say that, but Sequable defines the .seq() method, so it will succeed > in a seq call. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
