On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Given that some-> threads while non-nil but the fn some stops with the > first logical true value, this seems counter-intuitive to me. when-> seems > better here, or while-> perhaps? What other names were considered? > when and while also use logical truth. We don't have anything where the > basis is non-nil. Thus my extended description of how some* could come to > occupy that role. > Ah, OK, so the change in semantics is specifically to allow threading of true/false (as well as other non-nil values)... your intent is much clearer to me now, thanx. I'm fine with some-> after hearing that. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
