Oops - you'd think I'd be able to match braces by now ;-) I must admit that I don't know how to write this more clearly either without a large rewrite, so it probably is best to just leave it as it is.
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:28:21 PM UTC+1, Andy Fingerhut wrote: > > The full sentence is this: > > Syntax-quote (`, note, the "backquote" character), Unquote (~) and > Unquote-splicing (~@) > > It looks like perhaps someone started writing this: > > Syntax-quote (`), Unquote (~) and Unquote-splicing (~@) > > and then added some more explanatory text inside the parentheses to > emphasize which quote character it is. I'm not saying it is as good as it > can be now, but I'm not sure this would be much better, as someone is bound > to point out that the ` character is not in parentheses like all the others > are on that page: > > Syntax-quote ` (note, the "backquote" character), Unquote (~) and > Unquote-splicing (~@) > > Andy > > > On Dec 2, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Otto Allmendinger wrote: > > (I couldn't figure out where to put this so I might as well just post it > here) > > > The page says > > > Syntax-quote (` > > where it should say > > > Syntax-quote `( > > > Otto > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
