Here's what I use to pull symbols from Enlive into FW/1:
(def ^:private enlive-symbols
['append 'at 'clone-for 'content 'do-> 'html-content 'prepend
'remove-class 'set-attr 'substitute])
(defmacro enlive-alias ^:private [sym]
`(let [enlive-sym# (resolve (symbol (str "html/" ~sym)))]
(intern *ns* (with-meta ~sym (meta enlive-sym#)) (deref enlive-sym#))))
This pulls in both functions and macros. It hard-codes the alias for
Enlive (html, for net.cgrand.enlive-html) but otherwise should serve
your needs. FW/1 uses it like this:
(doseq [sym enlive-symbols]
(enlive-alias sym))
Sean
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:19 PM, the80srobot <a...@ingenious.cz> wrote:
> I have come up with a solution to a problem I don't think exists outside of
> my mind, but since I can't for the life of me figure out how Clojure 'wants'
> me to do this, I thought I would bounce this off the Google Group.
>
> The scenario: I am trying to collect a bunch of functions and macros from
> all the different namespaces in my library into a single namespace; let's
> call the namespace adams-lib.api. The idea is that the consumer of the
> library will only have to include that one API namespace, and not all of the
> little namespaces with parts of the functionality.
>
> The problem: Obviously, calling (use) doesn't cut it, because the aliased
> vars are not immigrated by subsequent calls to the (use) of the namespace
> that (used) them. You know what I mean.
>
> The "solution": For functions this is simpler, but macros pose some
> additional challenges, which is why I'm including my "solution" for
> immigrating macros. Hold on to your hats, this one is ugly:
>
> (defmacro immigrate-macro
> [ns-sym macro-sym]
> `(let [ nspublics# (ns-publics '~ns-sym)
> macro-var# (nspublics# '~macro-sym)
> macro-fn# @macro-var#
> macro-meta# (meta macro-var#)]
> (def ~macro-sym macro-fn#)
> (. (var ~macro-sym) (setMacro))
> (reset-meta! (var ~macro-sym) macro-meta#))
> nil)
>
>
> And using it:
>
> (immigrate-macro adams-lib.some-other-ns some-macro)
>
>
> There has got to be a simpler/better/less insane way of doing this. Would
> anyone care to weigh in? For the record, I fully realize that my solution is
> not OK.
>
> -Adam
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
"Perfection is the enemy of the good."
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
