Jay Fields writes: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hello Jay, >> >> I'd like to learn a little bit more from what makes you prefer emacs >> over IntelliJ. >> As the main developer of Counterclockwise, I'm I could learn some >> ideas, if not lessons, from your experience. > > Sure, responses inline-
While it's great to list features, the specific features really aren't the point--the point is that new features can be added with very little friction. If you had to restart the program and lose all the state you've built up just to try out a new command you're going to be less likely to bother with it, but if you can just open up your dotfiles, bash out a new defn and try it incrementally, you're going to be more likely to experiment with the little things. I blogged (ranted?) a bit about this a while ago: http://technomancy.us/115 But perhaps it's redundant to praise at length the benefits of a repl-driven workflow to this audience. =) -Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
