Am 29.01.2013 23:05, schrieb Phil Hagelberg: > > Jay Fields writes: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hello Jay, >>> >>> I'd like to learn a little bit more from what makes you prefer emacs >>> over IntelliJ. >>> As the main developer of Counterclockwise, I'm I could learn some >>> ideas, if not lessons, from your experience. >> >> Sure, responses inline- > > While it's great to list features, the specific features really aren't > the point--the point is that new features can be added with very little > friction. If you had to restart the program and lose all the state > you've built up just to try out a new command you're going to be less > likely to bother with it, but if you can just open up your dotfiles, > bash out a new defn and try it incrementally, you're going to be more > likely to experiment with the little things. > > I blogged (ranted?) a bit about this a while ago: http://technomancy.us/115 > > But perhaps it's redundant to praise at length the benefits of a > repl-driven workflow to this audience. =) > > -Phil >
you can do repl driven development with intellij as well i think. -- -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
