> It's true that many people will want/need leiningen at some point, but
> Clooj will suffice for a long time for some kinds of work and one can
> use lein and Clooj together to do quite a lot more.

There's really no reason (apart from a lack of motivated devs working on
it) that you'd have to choose between the two. As of Leiningen 2.x it's
possible to use Leiningen as a library, which is how CCW uses it. It
would be easy in theory for Clooj to detect that it's working within a
Leiningen project, use Leiningen to handle its REPL, and offer to launch
various Leiningen tasks in the context of the project. Then it could all
be handled by a single uberjar; no messy install.

I'd be happy to offer pointers for Leiningen integration in the
#leiningen channel on Freenode if anyone wants to make this happen.

-Phil

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to