A function could be appropriate, but a macro not appropriate, since
everything you need here can be done with using macros.
On Feb 21, 2013 7:53 AM, "Ryan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your input Alex.
>
> Do you think a macro would be appropriate if I use this more than once in
> my code?
>
> Ryan
>
> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:41:49 PM UTC+2, Alex Baranosky wrote:
>>
>> I'd often just write it like this:
>>
>> (defn create-map []
>>> (merge {:foo "a"
>>> :bar "b"
>>> ... many more keys}
>>> (when (some-condition-true)
>>> {:extra-key value)))
>>
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Meikel for your reply.
>>>
>>> It wasn't clear on my example, but I wish to use *merge *inside my
>>> create-map function. Do you think I should bind my hash-map to a let
>>> variable first and then apply merge, or do you have another proposal? What
>>> i mean is this:
>>>
>>> (defn create-key-value [value]
>>>
>>> (when (some-condition-true) {:extra-key value))
>>>
>>>
>>> (defn create-map []
>>>> (let [my-map {:foo "a" :bar "b"}]
>>>> (merge my-map (create-key-value "some-value")))
>>>
>>>
>>> Is the above "clojurish" or is there a better way? For example if the
>>> my-map was a big hash-map, and not with just two pairs, wouldn't it be ugly
>>> with the above way? or..it's just fine and no better way is possible?
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:02:21 PM UTC+2, Meikel Brandmeyer
>>> (kotarak) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> merge works with nil. So (merge (create-map) (create-key-value
>>>> "some-value")) should work as you intend with the functions as they are
>>>> defined now.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Meikel
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
