> > you *must* preserve laziness whenever applicable, but you *may not* take > advantage of it by assuming any guarantees. > > > Erm - I certainly hope that this isn't true. Otherwise, I wouldn't be able > to write: > > (take 10 (repeatedly 0)) > > Because, without *some* guarantees, it might never terminate and/or > consume all memory. >
Exactly :) I have tried in vain to find any official statement on this. Throughout the API documentation you'll find guarantees such as "preserves laziness", "returns a lazy sequence", but nowhere do I find any commitment at all to the content of that term. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
