> > Oops ;) > Of course you are right. The amazing thing is that the times I observed > fitted somehow the situation (the first (fib 30) call taking much more time > than the others, the third call more than the second and fourth) that I was > tricked into believing the calculations were being done and wasn't careful > enough ... >
Hmm, my guess would be that the jvm is optimising the code. Most things run slower the first time. That doesn't explain the third run though, although it could have been a coincidence. It was indeed very tricky. :) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
