Good stuff and I really enjoyed reading it too. Thanks,
J On Saturday, April 20, 2013 1:11:59 AM UTC-3, Michael Klishin wrote: > > > 2013/4/20 u1204 <da...@axiom-developer.org <javascript:>> > >> There is a HUGE gulf between the user documentation and maintaining >> the code. Just like there is a huge difference between using a car >> and maintaining a car. >> > > There are two things to consider: > > * Your audience is other developers. > * Most projects are relatively small and straightforward compared to the > Clojure compiler. > > My point was "at least try to find a new maintainer". Don't let it rot. > > There is a blog post in the community that I'm referring to between the > lines. > It won't be hard to figure out which one. The idea is, "don't do that". > Don't turn > your project into abandonware if you no longer want to maintain it well. > > Projects such as ring, clj-time, clj-http have found new > maintainers and those people do a great job with them. > -- > MK > > http://github.com/michaelklishin > http://twitter.com/michaelklishin > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
