>> TL:DR 
>>
>>         Write ideas for humans around your code or it will die. 
>>         Explain, don't document. 
>>
>>  
>Excellent post, Tim. Thanks for writing it all up.
>
>Though, I tend to think that "documenting" is the same as "explaining" 
>(what good is documentation if it doesn't explain?).

The word "explain" is semantically the same as "document" to most 
people but not to the programmer community.

I chose the word "explain" carefully. The word "document" has negative
emotional overtones for programmers. It usually implies fulfilling 
checklist requirements like "Does it have a Javadoc stanza?".

I just gave a talk at the WriteTheDocs conference. People who do
this for a living ("documentarians") were proposing creating games
like "document like a pirate day" to "entice programmers to document".

Personally, I see documentation as a mark of a professional.
Rise to the standard or retire into management.

Tim Daly
Curmudgeon at Large

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to