Stuart Halloway said in his video Clojure in the Field ( http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Clojure-tips) from March 1, 2013 (I think): "I don't feel the absence of a debugger because I've learnt enough that I don't ever need a debugger." I am very intrigued by that statement. What does he (or you, if you are reading, Stuart) mean? For me, debugging is the biggest thing that I don't know how to do well currently in Clojure (I use Vim, and have not programmed in Clojure for a while), so I am really interested in what he meant.
And by the way: As I said, I have not been using Clojure for a few months, but: What's the state of the art of debugging for Vim users? I've been meaning to try out vim-fireplace and ritz and see if they work together well, but have not gotten around to it yet. I would very much appreciate a nudge in the right direction. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
