Oskar Kvist <oskar.kv...@gmail.com> writes: > Stuart Halloway said in his video Clojure in the Field ( > http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Clojure-tips) from March 1, 2013 (I > think): "I don't feel the absence of a debugger because I've learnt enough > that I don't ever need a debugger." I am very intrigued by that statement. > What does he (or you, if you are reading, Stuart) mean? For me, debugging > is the biggest thing that I don't know how to do well currently in Clojure > (I use Vim, and have not programmed in Clojure for a while), so I am really > interested in what he meant.
I'm an emacs head, and that was my originally my first and only experience of lisp. I've really enjoyed learning clojure, and have found it both very useful and very nice. The REPL is great, I eval stuff and play with things. I use test. Still miss the Elisp debugger, which is great. It's right there, in your editing environment. It's good for debugging my own code. It's really good for working out someone elses code. I wish I debug clojure in the same way. It's not essential, of course. But nice. Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
