Warren Lynn <wrn.l...@gmail.com> writes:

>> Still miss the Elisp debugger, which is great. It's right there, in your 
>> editing environment. It's good for debugging my own code. It's really 
>> good for working out someone elses code. I wish I debug clojure in the 
>> same way. It's not essential, of course. But nice. 
>>
>> Phil 
>>
>
> I miss the Elisp debugger or Common Lisp debugger too. They made fixing an 
> issue so much easier. I think good REPL is a complement (and a very 
> important/good one) to it, not a replacement to it. I don't know if I 
> gained much (or any) if I got a good tool but lost another good one.


Yeah, this is exactly what I feel. The elisp debugger is joy because
it's right there, in your editing environment and is very first class;
although if you are debugging the command loop this is a problem, but in
general it's fantastic.

I like the test environment in clojure, and although they exist in elisp
I never really use them; don't know why, just habit I guess. And yes, in
it's absence, I do lean on other tools instead. Still, it would be nice.

Phil


-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to