Visual Studio and all around it is almost the only point why people use CLR. If language does not have VS integration (or integration is basic) there is no point to restrict yourself to CLR and this makes people to go with JVM versions of language as this give more wider options for deployment.
Четвер, 6 червня 2013 р. 09:55:13 UTC+3 користувач Zed Becker написав: > Why do the languages running on the CLR (ironRuby, ironPython, ironScheme, > ScalaCLR) do not get to live long enough in the sunshine, whereas same > languages get embraced by the Java runtime, and live in the limelight? > > Chas did a survey in 2012, which gave very negative results for > clojureCLR, with 70% people having no motivation to even play with it, and > almost no production use. > > How can ClojureCLR be protected from dwindling? > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
