According, to the library coding standards, the first is better:
(release-sharks 2 :laser-beams true) ; good
(release-sharks 2 {:laser-beams true}) ; bad
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Library+Coding+Standards
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:26:15 PM UTC+12, Omer Iqbal wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> What'c considered more idiomatic when having multiple, optional arguments?
>
> (defn foo1 [a b & args]
> (let [opts (apply hash-map args]
> ...))
>
> or
>
> (defn foo2 [a b opts]
> ...)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Omer
>
>
>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
