On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> wrote: > I might be wrong, but I think reducers are only faster in situations > where you bash many filters/maps/mapcats/etc on top of each other. >
Or use fold on a large vector with a multi-core machine. You might try fold-into-vec to see if there is any difference; (defn fold-into-vec [coll] "Provided a reducer, concatenate into a vector. Note: same as (into [] coll), but parallel." (r/fold (r/monoid into vector) conj coll)) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
