You can do this with the second argument to the where function. I added an 
example here:
https://github.com/r0man/sqlingvo/blob/master/test/sqlingvo/test/core.clj#L24

On Saturday, July 6, 2013 4:02:23 PM UTC+2, Carlo wrote:
>
> This is a fairly restricted composition, though:
>
> (def triangles (compose (select [:color :num_sides] (from :shapes))
>                         (where '(= :num_sides 3))))
> (def green-triangles (compose triangles
>                               (where '(= :color "green"))))
> (sql green-triangles)
> ;=> ["SELECT color, num_sides FROM shapes WHERE (color = ?)" "green"]
>
> We've lost our `num_sides` selection, so now our query is wrong. "Last 
> clause wins" means you have to be aware of the previous ones to ensure you 
> don't obliterate them when "composing".
>
> The same example in `clojure-sql`:
>
> (def triangles (-> (table :shapes)
>                    (project [:color :num_sides])
>                    (select '(= :num_sides 3))))
> (def green-triangles (select triangles '(= :color :green)))
> (deref green-triangles)
> ;=> ["SELECT \"shapes2142\".\"color\" AS \"color\", 
> \"shapes2142\".\"num_sides\" AS \"num_sides\" FROM \"shapes\" AS 
> \"shapes2142\" WHERE ((\"shapes2142\".\"num_sides\" = 3) AND 
> (\"shapes2142\".\"color\" = ?))" "green"]
>
> On 6 July 2013 22:37, r0man <roman....@burningswell.com <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> Composing queries is done via "compose".
>>
>> Take a look here: 
>> https://github.com/r0man/sqlingvo/blob/master/test/sqlingvo/test/core.clj#L16
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, July 6, 2013 5:46:06 AM UTC+2, Carlo wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Roman,
>>>
>>> The issue that I see with `sqlingvo`, and the thing which I was trying 
>>> to solve for myself, is that it doesn't compose well. Unless I'm missing 
>>> something, you have to generate the entire query in the one `sql` form. To 
>>> me, this is a big restriction and was the number one thing I was trying to 
>>> fix with `clojure-sql`.
>>>
>>> The basic sort of thing I want to be able to do is this:
>>>
>>> (def users (-> (table :users) (project [:id :person :username])))
>>> (def people (-> (table :people) (project [:id :first-name])))
>>>
>>> (def combined-query (-> people
>>>                         (rename {:id :person})
>>>                         (join users)
>>>                         (project [:username :first-name])))
>>>
>>> So now in queries I can use `people`, `users` and `combined-query` in 
>>> the same way. The only difference in terms of how I can compose them is 
>>> that they expose different fields (`users` exposes [:id, :person, 
>>> :username], `people` exposes [:id :first-name], `combined-query` exposes 
>>> [:username :first-name]). In this example it's not completely obvious why 
>>> this would be beneficial, but it means that I can change `users`, for 
>>> instance, to also have a `(select '(= :deleted false)` in its definition 
>>> and no other code has to change. They will all join/query against the users 
>>> where `deleted` is false without any other modifications of code.
>>>
>>> This freedom of composition is what you have in relational algebra, and 
>>> what I was trying to get in Clojure as well. All the naming of tables and 
>>> field aliases and everything is handled by the library, so you only have to 
>>> worry about constructing the queries. Unfortunately SQL provides a number 
>>> of operations outside of the relational algebra model (grouping, sorting, 
>>> take/drop), so they've been "tacked on" as a bit of an afterthought and 
>>> could probably use some improvement.
>>>
>>> Looking at `sqlingvo` did show up a mistake that I made in how I was 
>>> dealing with sorts, though, so thanks for that! I think our libraries just 
>>> have fairly different concerns at the moment.
>>>
>>> Carlo
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 July 2013 20:59, r0man <roman....@burningswell.**com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Carlo,
>>>>
>>>> if you'are looking for generating more complex SQL there's also:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/r0man/**sqlingvo <https://github.com/r0man/sqlingvo>
>>>>
>>>> Roman.
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:48:07 AM UTC+2, Carlo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey guys!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been working on a small library to make writing SQL queries a 
>>>>> little bit easier. It's along the same lines as ClojureQL, but takes a 
>>>>> different approach and compiles into quite different SQL in the end.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the moment it's quite immature, but it should be able to support 
>>>>> any queries which can be expressed in relational algebra. There will be 
>>>>> some SQL queries which can't be expressed in clojure-sql, but hopefully 
>>>>> there won't be too many of those. A greater limitation is that at the 
>>>>> moment the SQL generation is specific to the PostgresSQL database 
>>>>> (although 
>>>>> any contributions for other databases are welcome!).
>>>>>
>>>>> Dependency vector: [clojure-sql "0.1.0"]
>>>>> Repository: 
>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/czan/**clo**jure-sql<https://bitbucket.org/czan/clojure-sql>
>>>>> Clojars link: 
>>>>> https://clojars.org/clojure-**sq**l<https://clojars.org/clojure-sql>
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know what you think!
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlo
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to