On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Ray Miller <r...@1729.org.uk> wrote: > Pure. Simple. Beautiful. (Not that I'm the best Scheme programmer ever, > but to me it looks beautiful, and it conforms well to the base of the > problem. You get the point.) > > >> > This is not implementing expt as it is usually known, it looks more like > repeated squaring to me. >
Agreed. There's a certain irony that the OP declares the code pure, simple, and beautiful, when it isn't correct code. Seems to me that if you can't tell at a glance what a 3-line program is doing, there's something wrong :) --Mark -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
