defrecord uses IKeywordLookup's getLookupThunk, but I can't figure out how
to implement it.

Thanks,
Ambrose


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant <
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I mean something like what defrecord does:
>
> (defprotocol SumProto
>   (sum [x y]))
>
> (declare ->Pair)
>
> (deftype Pair [^long a ^long b]
>   clojure.lang.ILookup
>   (valAt [this k]
>     (case k
>       :a a
>       :b b))
>
>   SumProto
>   (sum [x y]
>     (let [new-a (+ (:a x) (:a y))
>           new-b (+ (:b x) (:b y))]
>       (->Pair new-a new-b))))
>
> Thanks,
> Ambrose
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Dmitry Groshev <lambdadmi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Interesting, can you please explain somewhat more?
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, September 21, 2013 3:19:16 AM UTC+4, Ambrose
>> Bonnaire-Sergeant wrote:
>>
>>> Just a thought, could implementing IKeywordInvoke and using keywords for
>>> field lookups speed up compilation?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ambrose
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Dmitry Groshev 
>>> <lambda...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  In this mail I'm talking about Clojure 1.4, however, I believe that
>>>> the issue persists in later versions, too.
>>>>
>>>> I have quite a lot of code of the following form:
>>>>
>>>> (defprotocol sum-proto
>>>>   (sum [x y]))
>>>>
>>>> (deftype Pair
>>>>     [^long a ^long b]
>>>>   sum-proto
>>>>   (sum [x y]
>>>>     (let [^Pair y y
>>>>           new-a (+ (.a x) (.a y))
>>>>           new-b (+ (.b x) (.b y))]
>>>>       (Pair. new-a new-b))))
>>>>
>>>> In real code there are *a lot* of implementations in that deftype
>>>> generated by macroses. The problem is that compilation time skyrocketed.
>>>> Right now I'm facing 5-10 seconds of compilation, which makes incremental
>>>> development very painful. Profiler shows that the overwhelming majority of
>>>> this time is spent here: [1]. It follows that the problem is in that ^Pair
>>>> annotation: when symbol is tagged by a symbol, it should be resolved as a
>>>> class. It should be way faster if I can "cache" that resolution, but I
>>>> can't given that those implementation are inside of deftype, I can't
>>>> resolve in advance the class that isn't defined. And I can't use
>>>> extend-type either because of the cost of extra var lookup.
>>>>
>>>> The main question is: what can I do to make compilation faster?
>>>> Pre-resolving that class won't work, it seems.
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://github.com/**clojure/clojure/blob/master/**
>>>> src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.**java#L986<https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java#L986>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to