On Thursday, December 26, 2013 9:01:56 PM UTC+1, HamsterofDeath wrote: > > exactly which part of OOP is missing in clojure that you would like to use? > if you took my java code and ported it to clojure, the main difference > would be (a b) instead of b.a , but the main design would be similar >
How can that be? What about encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism? OOP is not just syntactic sugar. If I were to implement something (complex enough) in C and C++ the differences between my implementations would be far from superficial. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
