On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:56 PM, John D. Hume <duelin.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > The misconception I hope is disappearing is that REPL-driven development in > Emacs necessarily involves lots of switching and copy-pasting back and forth > between source file buffers and a REPL buffer. The video in Jay's blog post > makes it pretty clear you never need to see the REPL prompt to use the REPL > to change a running system.
Agreed but my point was that in Emacs the results of your evaluations are "elsewhere" and there is still a separate REPL buffer, even if you actually work by editing a source file and sending expressions from there to the REPL to operate on a "live" image. I believe it was Mark Engelberg who talked about working *in* the REPL and scrolling back through history and modifying and resubmitting previous forms while he was developing his code. I think others have also said they work that way. The objection was voiced (about LightTable) that it's not a natural REPL-based workflow to have code in a source file and "send" it to be evaluated. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.