On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:43:18 PM UTC-5, Laurent Droin wrote: > > > (def inf Long/MAX_VALUE) > (defn quantize > [x markers values] > (let > [f (partial (fn([%1 %2 %3] (cond (<= %1 %2) %3))) x)] > (first (filter #(not (nil? %))(map f (conj markers inf) values))))) > > The reason I didn't go with Long/MAX_VALUE is that it breaks down for arbitrary precision and bigints which is a no-no for me.
There is many many ways this function could look. Mine is just one example. For instance many clojurist's would probably prefer to call it like this: (quantize 0 :small 5 :med :10 :large :huge). I didn't go through your code. But many people don't like to overuse anonymous functions especially if you use 3 parameters (what is %1, %2 %3?, if they had a name it'd be clearer). But this is just style so it's very subjective. Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
