I know. Isn't Clojure beautiful? Sigh... In the docs for *partition*<http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/partition>, it says that partition returns a lazy sequence. And if you look at the source section of the docs for *some*<http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/some> you can see that it uses recursion under the hood. So you should be covered there.
Thanks for the interesting discussion. =) On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:56:17 AM UTC-8, Laurent Droin wrote: > > Wow, that's amazing. Thanks Billy and Johanna. I'm going to try all this > tonight. > > What I'm not sure of (I don't have a good understanding yet about lazy > sequences) is whether or not the sequence given to "some" is lazy or not. > For example, if I have thousands of parameters but x is <= the first > boundary value (i.e. the first element in the sequence), I don't really > want to test x against all the other boundary values in the sequence since > I already know it's not nil. > Otherwise, I was thinking I could use recursion, take the two first > elements of the sequence, and see if I could conclude. If not, I would call > the function again against the rest of the sequence. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
