Re the discussion around some?/if-some/when-some... Summarizing feedback here: 1) "some?" has a confusion with "some" (but some congruence with some->, some->>) 2) other names might be better (not-nil?, nnil?, exists?, value?) 3) if-some and when-some lack the word "let" to clue you into their binding nature
Regarding 1 and 2, all of these factors were discussed prior to selecting the current names, so I don't think there was any new compelling information. All of these names (including the ones chosen) have downsides (double negatives, possible collisions with existing non-core code, etc). The current names will remain as is. Regarding 3, "let" was omitted in the name due to length but we are going to tweak the docstring to signal more strongly the relationship to if-let and when-let. Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
