On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Karsten Schmidt <i...@toxi.co.uk> wrote:
> On the more problematic side: One of the most hairy & obstructing things > though, has been Clojure's insistence of non-circular dependencies between > namespaces and I've yet to come up with a solution to truly make this work > as elegant as I think it could/should be. I do understand the reasons & > reasoning behind that limitation, but the truth is, there're a number of > use cases where there simply is no clean way to avoid a circular nature and > in total I've probably lost a few weeks just trying to find a workaround > for this project alone. > +1 to this. I've experienced this loss of productivity myself while working around circular dependencies, and agree that the end result is never as elegant as I think it should be. Thanks for providing a concrete example. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
