the first isnt pure clojure wo I would probably try to avoid this... e.g. what if I want to port to clojureCLR?
The second 'looks' quite a roundabout way of simply manipulating a string? How would the following compare for performance? (defn replace-substring [s r start len] (str (subs s 0 start) r (subs s (+ len start)))) If there is nothing better then I wonder why there isn't something like this in the clojure standard libraries (must be a good reason I suppose)? Its a fairly standard function for a string library isnt it? Andy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.