I guess my point is that if the java function is so good, then why doesnt the clojure library thinly wrap it, so that your code remains portable clojure?
On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 12:50:00 UTC+1, guns wrote: > > On Wed 2 Apr 2014 at 04:06:40AM -0700, Andy Smith wrote: > > > If there is nothing better then I wonder why there isn't something > > like this in the clojure standard libraries (must be a good reason I > > suppose)? Its a fairly standard function for a string library isnt it? > > It would be a terrible function for an immutable string library. > StringBuilder and StringBuffer are solid, fast, and working with them in > Clojure is painless. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
