This will only give you one nil:
(doseq [i (range 1 10000)]
(let [val (Math/sqrt i)
diff (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val val)))]
(when (> diff 1.1755025E-38)
(println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i diff)))))
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 9:28:44 PM UTC+2, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> 2014-04-08 20:49 GMT+02:00 Toby Crawley <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> :
>
>> Does this give you the results you are looking for?
>>
>> (doall
>> (for [i (range 1 1000)
>> :let [val (Math/sqrt i)
>> diff (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val val)))]
>> :when (> diff 1.1755025E-38)]
>> (println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i diff))))
>>
>
> It is a lot better. But for every result I get a nil value:
> (doall
> (for [i (range 1 10000)
> :let [val (Math/sqrt i)
> diff (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val val)))]
> :when (> diff 1.1755025E-38)]
> (println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i diff))))
>
> Gives:
> Different for 838 (1.136868e-13)
> Different for 3352 (4.547474e-13)
> Different for 3674 (4.547474e-13)
> Different for 5343 (9.094947e-13)
> Different for 7667 (9.094947e-13)
> Different for 7863 (9.094947e-13)
> Different for 9470 (1.818989e-12)
> (nil nil nil nil nil nil nil)
>
> Is it possible to get rid of the last line:
> (nil nil nil nil nil nil nil)
>
>
>> [email protected] <javascript:> writes:
>>
>> > In common lisp I had the following code:
>> > (let (
>> > (difference)
>> > (i)
>> > (val)
>> > )
>> > (loop for i from 1 to 10000000 do
>> > (setq val (sqrt i))
>> > (setq difference (abs (- (expt val 2) (* val val))))
>> > (unless (< difference 1.1755025E-38)
>> > (print (format nil "Different for ~D (~F)." i difference))
>> > )))
>> >
>> > Clojure works a little bit different. Until now I have the following
>> with
>> > comes near the above:
>> > (for [i (range 1 1000)]
>> > (do
>> > (def ^:dynamic val (Math/sqrt i))
>> > (def ^:dynamic difference (Math/abs (- (Math/pow val 2) (* val
>> > val))))
>> > (when (> difference 1.1755025E-38)
>> > (println (format "Different for %d (%e)" i difference))
>> > )))
>> >
>> > But beside that this defines the two variables val and difference, it
>> also
>> > generates a lot of nil values.
>> >
>> > What would be a better way to do this in Clojure?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cecil Westerhof
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected] <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cecil Westerhof
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
