At the moment I have the following:
(def numbers '(4 6 8 10))
(doseq [number numbers]
(foo number))
The call foo generates some output, but I also want to save the time it
took for the call to complete. At the moment I am thinking about
something like:
(def numbers '(4 6 8 10))
(def ^:dynamic needed-times ())
(doseq [number numbers]
(let [start (now)]
(foo number)
(def ^:dynamic needed-times
(cons (- (.getTimeInMillis (now))
(.getTimeInMillis start))
needed-times))))
But it looks a 'little' cumbersome. Is there a better way to do this?
Also if I need to use several points in time, do I keep nesting 'let',
or is there a better way?
--
Cecil Westerhof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
