On Saturday, April 26, 2014 9:21:26 PM UTC-7, Mars0i wrote: > I like the general idea of the Valentin's proposal, but I don't > understand every bit of it. It sounds complicated. Personally, I'd > rather see something that's relatively simple, and good enough, than > something that's perfect but unwieldy. If it's too difficult, people > won't use it, or they'll waste time, or feel that the Clojure > community expects them to spend too much time on something that > detracts from what's important.
Double-inc[1] on this. Clojure needs people who care about documentation far more than it needs another documentation system. Don't try to apply a technical solution to a social problem. -Phil [1] - or dinc, as I like to call it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
