On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:47:58 PM UTC-5, da...@axiom-developer.org wrote: > > Phil, > > > I like the general idea of the Valentin's proposal, but I don't > > understand every bit of it. It sounds complicated. Personally, I'd > > rather see something that's relatively simple, and good enough, than > > something that's perfect but unwieldy. If it's too difficult, people > > won't use it, or they'll waste time, or feel that the Clojure > > community expects them to spend too much time on something that > > detracts from what's important. > > Can I ask, quite seriously and not intending any sarcasm, what you mean > by "detracts from what's important"? > > For me, "what's important" is to communicate ideas, designs, and details > from one developer to another so that others can maintain, modify, and > extend what exists. I've already held forth on what I think that implies > so I won't bore you with it. > > What I don't understand is your criteria for "what's important" and > how that translates to action. > > If we can agree on "what's important" then the technical details would > have common criteria for "simple and good enough vs something that's > perfect but unwieldy". > > Tim Daly >
We agree. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
