It's worth pointing out that var indirection is already cheap in Java--it 
is generally dominated by IO, memory access, object construction, dynamic 
dispatch... The JIT compiler will inline any var access if the var doesn't 
visibly change, and only needs to check one word of memory per var each 
time the JIT compiled function is invoked. I've replaced vars with Java 
methods and found a 0% speedup.

On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 5:54:32 AM UTC-5, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote:
>
> Just read this blog post about Oxen (
> http://arrdem.com/2014/08/05/of_oxen,_carts_and_ordering/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter).
>  
> In it is mentioned that Rich is re-introducing invokeStatic to achieve a 
> possible 10% performance increase for Clojure 1.7.
>
> I couldn't find any information about this. Anyone know where I can find 
> out more?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to