I don't want to question your microbenchmarks, but I'm not sure you have the correct interpretation.
Read memory fences have little to no cost. In particular, read memory fences are a no-op (literally) on x86 unless the cache line is invalidated. On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 5:54:32 AM UTC-5, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote: > > Just read this blog post about Oxen ( > http://arrdem.com/2014/08/05/of_oxen,_carts_and_ordering/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter). > > In it is mentioned that Rich is re-introducing invokeStatic to achieve a > possible 10% performance increase for Clojure 1.7. > > I couldn't find any information about this. Anyone know where I can find > out more? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
