s...@corfield.org writes:

> Is that an intentional change? I ask because you claimed the release was 
> major but non-breaking - and this seems to be a breaking change...?

Did you change `start-chsk-router-loop!` to `start-chsk-router!`?  The
former maintains the previous event handler signature (and is thus
non-breaking), but the later requires the new signature.

Hugo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to