Thanks, that' clearer. Also I didn't take time to read the docstring "Returns non-nil if nums are in monotonically decreasing order, otherwise false."
so I guess [2] is monotonically decreasing and increasing at the same time. Maybe I just read too much about transducers and now I try -1 arity everywhere On Monday, September 15, 2014 2:34:56 PM UTC+2, Phillip Lord wrote: > > > > Jeremy Vuillermet <jeremy.v...@gmail.com <javascript:>> writes: > > > Could it return a (partial > 2) ? > > > Because > works with n args and not just two. > > (> 2) => (partial > 2) > > then why not > > (> 2 3) =? (partial > 2 3) > > when is the sensible place to stop? > > Now, if > took at most two args, this would be a sensible thing. > > As far as I can see, with > defined as it is you get the win that > > (> 10 9 8 7 6 5) > > works sensible but get a counter-intuitive behaviour for > > (> 1) > > Gains and losses. > > Phil > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
