Jeremy Vuillermet <jeremy.vuiller...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks, that' clearer. > Also I didn't take time to read the docstring > "Returns non-nil if nums are in monotonically decreasing order, > otherwise false." > > so I guess [2] is monotonically decreasing and increasing at the same > time.
Yeah, so the same list can be both decreasing and increasing at the same time. user> (def l '(1)) #'user/l user> (apply < l) true user> (apply > l) true So, < and > are not mutually exclusive. Numerically counter-intuitive, I think, although logically expected. > Maybe I just read too much about transducers and now I try -1 arity > everywhere Basically, you were expecting a form of curry. I think that would make sense, except that > is variadic. Got to know where to stop with curries in functional programming as in life. Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
