Why is this possible in a language based on immutability:
(let [x 1
x (inc x)
x (inc x)
x (inc x)]
x)
;;=> 4
Maybe under the hood (ie. memory registers/pointers etc.) this isn't
strictly mutation but as a relative newcomer to Clojure I find it goes
against the grain of what I find elsewhere in the language.
gvim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
