2015-02-12 3:06 GMT+01:00 gvim <gvi...@gmail.com>: > > That explains it but I think Clojure's syntax is misleading here. Without > knowledge of this magic the mind doesn't readily translate: > > In some other lisps, clojure's let is called let* for this reason. Their let binds only in parallel, similar to clojure's (binding []) form for vars.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
