On 04/05/2015 14:34, Ernie de Feria wrote:
I would like to echo the sentiment expressed by several posters in this
thread, but with a slight twist. A few years back I picked up Ruby and
Ruby on Rails as the language/framework to create a website with
moderate complexity and functionality. I did this without any prior
experience with the language of framework. What allowed me to quickly
pick up both was the excellent documentation around the language and
framework. For example, with the information from
http://guides.rubyonrails.org and the canonical application built in
https://www.railstutorial.org one can acquire the necessary knowledge to
develop highly functional websites. Branching out to leverage
"non-canonical" libraries/products then becomes a fairly easy exercise
(MongoDB instead of MySQL, Mongoid instead of ActiveRecords, etc.). What
allows that to happen is the momentum built around the Rails ecosystem
via community participation and documentation.

We have recently started to build our "back end" infrastructure in
Clojure. Many times we have discussed the value and desire to unify our
development efforts on and around Clojure. Inevitably we tally up all
the functionality inherited from Ruby gems (that play nice with Rails -
the Framework) that would have to be replicated in Clojure and there
always shortcomings, not necessarily in the availability of libraries
that perform these functions, but in the readily accessible
documentation about how to best integrate them.

The "composable libraries over framework" mantra is technically solid.
What we're missing, in the "web development with Clojure" subset of the
community, is the stewardship to create and maintain a canonical
amalgamation of composable libraries and the best practices around them
- a la https://railstutorial.org. This would lower the barrier of entry
into the web development realm for Clojure developers. My 2+ cents.


Clojure needs its own Rails or Typesafe Reactive Platform otherwise I fear it will remain a niche player. What's to lose? The current approach will always remain an option.

gvim







--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to