So using reflection on the objects gives the following signatures - they have identical signatures :
{:name apply, :return-type com.cra.figaro.language.CompoundDist, :declaring-class com.cra.figaro.language.Dist$, :parameter-types [scala.collection.Seq com.cra.figaro.language.Name com.cra.figaro.language.ElementCollection], :exception-types [], :flags #{:public}} {:name apply, :return-type com.cra.figaro.language.AtomicDist, :declaring-class com.cra.figaro.language.Dist$, :parameter-types [scala.collection.Seq com.cra.figaro.language.Name com.cra.figaro.language.ElementCollection], :exception-types [], :flags #{:public}} On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:05 PM Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Scala has to compile down to JVM bytecode just like Clojure, but it may > change method signatures along the way. > > You could try running `javap` to disassemble the compiled Scala bytecode > and figure out what the method signatures actually are. Or use Java > reflection to examine the objects you have and see what methods they > declare. > > –S > > > > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-4, Stephen Wakely wrote: >> >> I am trying to call into some Scala that has the following overloaded >> methods : >> >> def apply[T](clauses: (Double, Element[T])*)(implicit name: Name[T], >> collection: ElementCollection) = >> new AtomicDist(name, clauses.toList, collection) >> >> def apply[T](clauses: (Element[Double], Element[T])*)(implicit name: >> Name[T], collection: ElementCollection) = >> new CompoundDist(name, clauses.toList, collection) >> >> So one method takes a list of tuples of Double to Element and the other >> method takes a list of tuples of Element to Element. >> >> I am using t6.from-scala (https://github.com/t6/from-scala) to build up >> my list of Tuples. But when building these up there is no way to specify >> explicit type information about the collections. Consequently when calling >> this apply method Clojure will always choose to call the first method - >> even when my list is a collection of Element to Element tuples. >> >> I can definitely appreciate how it is going to be tricky for Clojure to >> determine the correct overload to use here. Is there any way I can somehow >> force it to call the correct overload myself? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Stephen >> >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.