Hi pyr, There are many downsides to hierarchical structure of components and systems. The effects are complicated and hard to understand. See, for example, the discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clojure/2-baBp61XTs/discussion
I recommend that system maps be kept "flat," without any nested systems. To prevent name clashes, you can always generate unique keys for the components. –S On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 2:47:03 PM UTC-4, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote: > > Would you directly assoc :inputA :inputB :outputA :outputB components > in the first layer of the system map or would you retain a hierarchical > structure and if so, are there any downsides to this ? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
