On 5 August 2015 at 18:04, Dmitri <dmitri.sotni...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that wrapping the functions is a sensible approach. Using > wrap-transaction is precisely how I ended up doing it with the conman yesql > wrapper https://github.com/luminus-framework/conman > > The approach I took there is to have the generated functions use the > connection atom, and have with-transaction rebind it to the transactional > connection within its scope. However, the functions also accept an explicit > connection, and with-transaction also provides explicit access to the > transactional connection >
So when you're testing, presumably you use a dynamic binding to override the global connection to the test database? - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
