All set here! Just to point out that the site generation didn't work with JBake v2.4.0 (latest stable). So, if you already use JBake, you will have to upgrade it to v2.5.0-SNAPSHOT, as suggested in the README file.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Dmitri <dmitri.sotni...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a note that the author of Cryogen is very responsive regarding > discussions on improvements and pull requests for additional functionality. > If there's a particular feature that's missing it might be worth creating > an issue or opening a pr for it. > > > On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 10:57:45 AM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> Hi Hildeberto, >> >> I built spikes of the site in a number of technologies like Cryogen, >> Stasis, Sphinx, Asciidoctor, and some of the other Ruby-based static >> generators as well. In the end, I found that JBake was the best match for >> our goals at this time. The site build architecture has been decided and >> we're not interested in revisiting that at this time. At some point down >> the road, based on experience and tool evolution, we may take another look, >> but not soon. >> >> Cryogen is a great tool and I would recommend it to others. One problem I >> had with it was its flexibility with respect to the url structure. I >> actually think for the purposes of creating a blog etc that is a dimension >> that is good to remove, but it was a downside for our use. >> >> We are working with a designer on the site look and feel and at some >> point that will be visible. At the point where that is visible, I expect >> there will be some evolution on front page, navigation structure, etc and >> would be happy to get feedback on that. >> >> Right now, we are primarily looking for content ideas and would love >> thoughts on that. Or if there is interest in enhancing existing pages, I >> would also like to talk about those. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 9:41:40 AM UTC-6, Hildeberto Mendonça >> wrote: >>> >>> That's a great initiative! Thanks! But I'm just sad to see JBake instead >>> of Cryogen (https://github.com/cryogen-project/cryogen-core) which is >>> written in Clojure :-( Can we send a pull request replacing JBake by >>> Cryogen or is JBake a final decision? >>> >>> -- >>> Hildeberto Mendonça, Ph.D >>> Blog: http://www.hildeberto.com >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/htmfilho >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Hildeberto Mendonça, Ph.D Blog: http://www.hildeberto.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/htmfilho -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
