Thanks a lot for your support and insights. I'm going to rewrite it to use
"with-open" as we speak.

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Marc Limotte <mslimo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Look at the source for the clojure.core with-open macro.  In the repl:
> `(source with-open)`.
>
> I think Gary is right.  with-open does exactly what you need, I should
> have thought of that, and you should probably use it.  But if you want to
> get your version working, trying to understand what the with-open macro is
> doing.  Your implementation can be simpler because you only have one
> explicit binding.  Essentially you'll create a let as a backquoted form and
> then splice in the explicit symbol from the user:
>
>
>    `(let [~sym ...server-instance-or-uri...] ... )
>
>
> marc
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Johan Haleby <johan.hal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Marc Limotte <mslimo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> With the macro approach, they don't need to escape it.
>>>
>>
>> Do you know of any resources of where I can read up on this? I have the
>> macro working with an implicit "uri" generated but I don't know how to make
>> it explicit (i.e. defined by the user) the way you proposed.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Johan Haleby <johan.hal...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your support Marc, really appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Marc Limotte <mslimo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I was assuming the HTTP calls happen inside the with-fake-routes! 
>>>>> block.
>>>>>
>>>>> I missed the part about the random port.  I se 3 options for that:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Assign a port, rather than random*
>>>>>
>>>>> (with-fake-routes! 9999 ...)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But then, of course, you have to worry about port already in use.
>>>>>
>>>>> *An atom*
>>>>>
>>>>> (def the-uri (atom nil))
>>>>> (with-fake-routes! the-uri
>>>>>   ...
>>>>>   (http/get @the-uri "/x"))
>>>>>
>>>>> *A macro*
>>>>>
>>>>> A common convention in Clojure would be to pass it a symbol (e.g.
>>>>> `uri` that is bound by the macro), rather implicitly creating `uri`.
>>>>>
>>>>> (with-fake-routes! [uri option-server-instance]
>>>>>
>>>>>     route-map
>>>>>
>>>>>     (http/get uri "/x"))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Didn't know about this convention so thanks for the tip. But is your
>>>> snippet above actually working code or does the user need escape "uri" and 
>>>> "
>>>> option-server-instance" using a single-quotes, i.e.
>>>>
>>>> (with-fake-routes! [*'*uri *'*option-server-instance] ...)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> or, with a pre-defined server
>>>>>
>>>>> (def fake-server ...)
>>>>> (with-fake-routes!
>>>>>
>>>>>     route-map
>>>>>
>>>>>     (http/get (:uri fake-server) "/x"))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> marc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Johan Haleby <johan.hal...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Johan Haleby <johan.hal...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your feedback, exactly what I wanted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 3:16:02 PM UTC+1, mlimotte wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't think you need a macro here.  In any case, I'd avoid using
>>>>>>>> a macro as late as possible.  See how far you get with just functions, 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> then maybe at the end, add one macro if you absolutely need it to add 
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> a touch of syntactic sugar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> routes should clearly be some sort of data-structure, rather than
>>>>>>>> side-effect setter functions.  Maybe this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (with-fake-routes!
>>>>>>>>   optional-server-instance
>>>>>>>>   route-map)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm now that I come to think of it I don't see how this would
>>>>>> actually work unless you also perform the HTTP request from inside the
>>>>>> scope of  with-fake-routes!, otherwise the server instance would be
>>>>>> closed before you get the chance to make the request. Since you make
>>>>>> an actual HTTP request you need access to the URI generated when starting
>>>>>> the fake-server instance (at least if the port is chosen randomly).
>>>>>> So either I suppose you would have to do like this (which requires a
>>>>>> macro?):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (with-fake-routes!
>>>>>>   {"/x" {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>> (io/resource "my.json"))}}
>>>>>>   ; Actual HTTP request
>>>>>>   (http/get uri "/x"))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where "uri" is created by the  with-fake-routes! macro *or* we could
>>>>>> return the generated fake-server. But if so with-fake-routes! cannot
>>>>>> automatically close the fake-server instance since we need the
>>>>>> instance to be alive when we make the call to the generated uri. I 
>>>>>> suppose
>>>>>> it would have to look something like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (let [fake-server (with-fake-routes! {"/x" {:status 200 :content-type
>>>>>> "application/json" :body (slurp (io/resource "my.json"))}})]
>>>>>> (http/get (:uri fake-server) "/x")
>>>>>> (shutdown! fake-server))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If so I think that the second option is unnecessary since then you
>>>>>> might just go with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (with-fake-routes!
>>>>>>   *required*-server-instance
>>>>>>   route-map)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> instead of having two options. But then we loose the niceness of
>>>>>> having the server instance be automatically created and stopped for us?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where optional-server-instance, if it exists is, an object
>>>>>>>> returned by (fake-server/start!).  If optional-server-instance is
>>>>>>>> not passed in, then with-fake-routes! creates it's own and is free
>>>>>>>> to call (shutdown!) on it automatically. And route-map is a Map of
>>>>>>>> routes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> "/x"
>>>>>>>>   {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>>>> (io/resource "my.json"))}
>>>>>>>> {:path "/y" :query {:q "something")}}
>>>>>>>>   {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>>>> (io/resource "my2.json"))}
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1. I'm gonna go for this option.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, at the risk of scope creep, I could foresee wanting the
>>>>>>>> response to be based on the input instead of just a static blob.  So 
>>>>>>>> maybe
>>>>>>>> the value of :body could be a string or a function of 1 arg, the 
>>>>>>>> route-- in
>>>>>>>> your code test with (fn?).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a good idea indeed. I've already thought about this for
>>>>>>> matching the request. I'd like this to work:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>  (fn [request] (= (:path request) "/x"))
>>>>>>>   {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>>> (io/resource "my.json"))}
>>>>>>> {:path "/y" :query {:q (fn [q] (clojure.string/starts-with? q
>>>>>>> "some"))}}
>>>>>>>   {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>>> (io/resource "my2.json"))}
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your help and feedback!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This gives you a single api, no macros, optional auto-server
>>>>>>>> start/stop or explicit server management.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> marc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Johan Haleby <johan....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've just committed an embryo of an open source project
>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/johanhaleby/fake-http> to fake http requests
>>>>>>>>> by starting an actual (programmable) HTTP server. Currently the API 
>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>> like this (which in my eyes doesn't look very Clojure idiomatic):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (let [fake-server (fake-server/start!)
>>>>>>>>>         (fake-route! fake-server "/x" {:status 200 :content-type 
>>>>>>>>> "application/json" :body (slurp (io/resource "my.json"))})
>>>>>>>>>         (fake-route! fake-server {:path "/y" :query {:q 
>>>>>>>>> "something")}} {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body 
>>>>>>>>> (slurp (io/resource "my2.json"))})]
>>>>>>>>>         ; Do actual HTTP request
>>>>>>>>>          (shutdown! fake-server))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fake-server/start! starts the HTTP server on a free port (and
>>>>>>>>> thus have side-effects) then you add routes to it by using
>>>>>>>>> fake-route!. The first route just returns an HTTP response with
>>>>>>>>> status code 200 and content-type "application/json" and the specified
>>>>>>>>> response body if a request is made with path "/x". The second line 
>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>> matches that a query parameter called "q" must be equal to 
>>>>>>>>> "something. In
>>>>>>>>> the end the server is stopped.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of converting all of this into a macro that is used
>>>>>>>>> like this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (with-fake-routes!
>>>>>>>>> "/x" {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>>>>> (io/resource "my.json"))}
>>>>>>>>> {:path "/y" :query {:q "something")}} {:status 200 :content-type
>>>>>>>>> "application/json" :body (slurp (io/resource "my2.json"))})
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This looks better imho and it can automatically shutdown the
>>>>>>>>> webserver afterwards but there are some potential problems. First of 
>>>>>>>>> all,
>>>>>>>>> since starting a webserver is (relatively) slow it you might want to 
>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>> this once for a number of tests. I'm thinking that perhaps as an
>>>>>>>>> alternative (both options could be available) it could be possible to 
>>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>>> start the fake-server and then supply it to with-fake-routes! as
>>>>>>>>> an additional parameter. Something like this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (with-fake-routes!
>>>>>>>>>         fake-server ; We pass the fake-server as the first
>>>>>>>>> argument in order to have multiple tests sharing the same fake-server
>>>>>>>>> "/x" {:status 200 :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp
>>>>>>>>> (io/resource "my.json"))}
>>>>>>>>>  {:path "/y" :query {:q "something")}} {:status 200 :content-type
>>>>>>>>> "application/json" :body (slurp (io/resource "my2.json"))})
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If so you would be responsible for shutting it down just as in the
>>>>>>>>> initial example.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Another thing that concerns me a bit with the macro is that routes
>>>>>>>>> doesn't compose. For example you can't define the route outside of 
>>>>>>>>> the with-fake-routes!
>>>>>>>>> body and just supply it as an argument to the macro (or can you?).
>>>>>>>>> I.e. I think it would be quite nice to be able to do something like 
>>>>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (let [routes [["/x" {:status 200 :content-type "application/json"
>>>>>>>>> :body (slurp (io/resource "my.json"))}]
>>>>>>>>>               [{:path "/y" :query {:q "something")}} {:status 200
>>>>>>>>> :content-type "application/json" :body (slurp (io/resource 
>>>>>>>>> "my2.json"))}]]]
>>>>>>>>>      (with-fake-routes routes))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would this be a good idea? Would it make sense to have overloaded
>>>>>>>>> variants of the with-fake-routes! macro to accommodate this as
>>>>>>>>> well? Should it be a macro in the first place? What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> /Johan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
>>>>>>> the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/gieS5hQCUm4/unsubscribe.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>>>> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/gieS5hQCUm4/unsubscribe.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/gieS5hQCUm4/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/gieS5hQCUm4/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to