I am not sure whether I understand what you mean. Behavior of conform for predicates is to return its return value if it is logically true, ::s/invalid otherwise. Thus the predicate itself is the spec to its conform*.
s/conformer is only limiting as much as it is to unform, a user would have to provide a spec for conforms result as well as he has to provide an unform-fn if he wants unforming. If each spec implemented a conform-spec* method, a spec could very well provide a spec of it's conform. On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 5:03:33 PM UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote: > > Given that conform takes an arbitrary (opaque) function, I don't think > that's generically possible. > > > On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 7:37:33 AM UTC-5, Leon Grapenthin wrote: >> >> Assume I parse with conform. >> >> Then I have functions that operate on the value returned by conform. I >> want to spec them. >> >> But I can't get a spec for the value returned by conform (so that I can >> spec said functions) automatically. >> >> Imagine `(s/conform-spec ::my-spec)` would return the spec of the result >> of calling (s/confom ::my-spec foo) >> >> So it would probably be valuable if a spec could give a spec of what its >> conform* returns` >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
