Did you read my whole question? It doesn't work to have the implementation namespace require the spec namespace either, as I demonstrated in my second example, where the spec for the factor function uses the prime? predicate.
On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 1:38:23 AM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote: > > I can’t help but think you’re making it way more complicated than it needs > to be. > > > > Define ::config in example.spec, and in example.core use > :example.spec/config (and, yes, require the example.spec namespace). > > > > You need to avoid circular namespace dependencies. > > > > Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org > > > > *From: *Sam Estep <javascript:> > *Sent: *Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:36 PM > *To: *Clojure <javascript:> > *Subject: *Re: [ANN] clojure-future-spec, a backport of clojure.spec for > 1.8 > > > > I spent quite a while trying to figure out how I can use some features of > spec, like destructuring, to work properly when my specs are in a separate > namespace. I asked a question > <http://stackoverflow.com/q/38024650/5044950> about this on Stack > Overflow; do you have any advice on how to solve the issues I detailed > there? > > On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 1:21:02 PM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote: > > On 6/29/16, 10:03 AM, "Lucas Bradstreet" <clo...@googlegroups.com on > behalf of lucasbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sean, a lot of library developers still want to support Clojure 1.8, > > but this would prevent using spec with their projects. > > clojure.java.jdbc solves that by having the specs in a separate namespace > (and by the tests conditionally loading that and clojure.spec.test). > clojure.java.jdbc supports back to Clojure 1.4. > > Nikita, it would be interesting to know how far back (in Clojure versions) > your library could support. I can see real value in being able to back port > spec beyond 1.8… > > Sean Corfield -- (970) FOR-SEAN -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
